RZRider wrote:I actually believe somewhat in iq tests. I am pretty sure you have never even took an iq test, Ninja, or you did not understand the process much, because if you did, you would know that I did not take the same test. It was actually a different version of the iq test, but still same idea. And I don't agree with alot you say. I think there is a difference between smart and intelligent. When I hear smart I think knowledgeable. When I hear intelligent, I think of someone you can figure something out, with minimum teaching and think about that thing on a " deeper level". Knowing something, and being intelligent are two completely different things. The iq test gives you patterns and stuff like that which tests your intelligence. For example, this is a very simple intelligence problem, not smart problem.
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,?,?,?.
What are the next 3 numbers
You know, it's kind of random that you're singling me out here when the arguments that you're giving don't refute any of the information stated by me in this thread.
Also, I have taken IQ tests, and I do understand the process, thank you very much. Furthermore, how was I to know that you took a different version of an IQ test? You were at fault there for not mentioning as much, and I was not. And according to a quick google search on the definitions of 'smart' and 'intelligence', you're wrong there too. 'Smart' refers to having or showing a quick-witted or acute intelligence, whilst 'intelligence' is simply the ability to acquire and apply knowledge.
And BTW, if someone says you're coming off as an elitist, then take their word for it and ask them how to fix that. You can't ever accurately judge yourself; and falling into a pit of low self-esteem (i.e.: say that you suck or other similar things) won't help either.